It offers very nice results, Im certain youd get on with it! HP5 Plus. Dies betrifft sowohl die Chemieflaschen als auch Papiere. Right out of the gate, I cant trust it. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Very little shadow detail, but great when you know how to use it. As I mentioned earlier, the film performs the best when over-exposed by a stop or a little less than a stop, but that shouldnt stop you from shooting it as the box speed of ASA-400. Regarding the Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed and develop with extended times or at Ei200 and develop normally? Another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast. The Minolta Maxxum 9 The Perfect Professional 35mm SLR? Compare Kodak T-Max 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus. Otherwise Id say its a tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 Plus. Thanks! A thorough article and greatly appreciated. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren ergebnissen bringen knnen. The Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan does so very frequently. Learn how your comment data is processed. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. Enter? But, as might have become evident at this point, my film choices are not exactly highly informed, I wasnt about to shoot test targets or anything ridiculous like that I just used both films as I usually would, then developed them according to the manufacturers instructions. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Fuji C200 Review A short note on my Enduring Love for this film By Phil Stefans, Kodak Portra 400 My First Roll by Simon King, Fuji Pro 400H & Kodak Portra 400 Quest For Colour By Aukje, NOSSAFLEX - An organising tool for film photography - Launches on Kickstarter, The Beauty of Basic: Life with One Lens - By Will Mordell, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. 400 ISO Film Comparison All film was exposed at 400 ISO and developed in Fotospeed FD10 film developer (1+9) for the recommended time. Gnstig, Haltbar, ergibt hervorragende Negative, vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. You know what they basically said? And believe me, they are crummy. allerdings wurden die Negative dann auch recht dicht- gerade so, wie ich sie fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige. I dont think I have as direct an analogy with Fomapan 400, its more of its own thing. The character of these films comes down to a combination of the above factors. So this post is very helpful many thanks. The datasheets say that at 2, you should go with a 6 exposure. While the pricing advantage of Fomapan has eroded recently due to inflation and other factors, its still usually my go-to when film-testing recently repaired cameras, and even the modest price savings from using it might help encourage experimentation and creative exploration that higher-priced films inherently rather discourage. Lines are clean, and micro-contrast is maintained. Kodak prices, in particular, vary from one supplier to another, but as I write this Analogue Wonderland are selling Fomapan 400 for 4, Tri-X is 9.75 and T-Max 400 is 10.50. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); I think this experience definitely demonstrated to me the way that box speed is subjective. I do keep a bottle of Rodinal on hand for slower films (Ferrania P30 or Across 100) but DD-X is my go-to for everything else. Kentmere is the easier and faster film, i have been able to get as good results as HP5+, and i somehow have this feel that the grain is smaller or less visible, may be completely objectively wrong. Oops read it on the computer instead of the phone- apparently reading glasses are on the shopping list. totally agree with the article. However I think because of the grain structure I often perceive the Fomapan to have a little bit of an edge in sharpness. I may try Fomapan as you did at EI=200. I'm open to any dispute. Shooting with Fomapan is a bit like traveling in the past. Shadow detail is close to non-existent in these situations, but I am usually happier with the look of these images. Re: Fomapan 100, 200 and 400. Whether thats true or not, it is widely known that Arista film (Freestyles house brand) is repackaged Foma; the Holga branded film sold by Freestyle is as well; and, Kosmo Fotos Stephen Dowling has been quite open about his ISO 100 film being Foma too. Consider supporting Studio C-41 Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. Fomapan 400 is one of those polarising films, either you love it or hate it, and even those who love the film have mixed opinions. Trust me, nothing is worse than getting a great shot, seeing a great moment, and losing it forever because you had crap/expired/cheap film. My previous pushing experiences with 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for their excellent latitude. Exposure: 1/500 @ F5.6 (Y2 filter and rubber lens hood) Film: Fomapan 200 Creative dev. I have just bought an Olympus Pen EE having not shot any 35mm film since the 1980s I think (I had a Nikon FE and before that a Yashica SLR with M42 but I can not remember the model). After digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop. But how did I come to love Fomapan 400? I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. Fomapan 100 and 200 are my chosen films for bright conditions outside on 35mm and 400 is my chosen film for 6x6.It's just not great for 35mm nor is it very adaptable to different light conditions.in my experience. Your link has been automatically embedded. Compare Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press ? Lens: Mamiya-Sekor 65mm F3.5. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren If you want some quality on iso 1600 with a iso 400 film use the HP5+ or films like delta 3200 or Tmax 3200 on iso 1600. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. 5x7 Fomapan 200 at e.i. Hvesterlos 1 yr. ago. It is, I believe, well known that Foma is a go-to choice for relabeled black-and-white film stocks, and evidence suggests that three of FPPs monster films are actually Fomapan 100, 200 and 400 respectively (the fourth appears to be Orwo UN54). The Kentmere is the real all rounder. The grain is fairly fine. FrancoCJanuary 9, 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an. einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der Film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! As a winter/autumn all rounder the Kentmere is serving me well, and Fomapan as a high-light film makes a lot of sense. The same can be said for HP5 Plus. Both are unique and can not replace the other. Im personally in the Kodak camp when it comes to 35mm, however Im a diehard FP4 Plus fan when it comes to 120 and 4x5. Die etwas strkere Krnung nehme ich gerne in Kauf. The developer shouldnt matter too much for this kind of process, any will do.The scanner I use is a Plustek 8100. I think again the Kentmere has more detail here, less lost in the shadows and better definition in the highlights. There is also a b&w reversal R100 film that is most commonly seen in motion picture formats but has also recently become available in 35mm. Id probably let it sit in the developer a little longer next time.Regardless of the negative density, the results speak for themself - just look at the detail in the chrome of the motorcycle pictured below. Update: December 30, 2020While keeping the original pricing at the time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020. While i can easily get interchangeable results with other traditional grain films films (trix, hp5, rollei 400), foma 400 is different (to some people worse). Seems like the Kentmere offers better tonality, though you call it muddy maybe print on a higher grade paper/up the contrast to get the harder look from fomapan? Was in D76 nix gescheites wird, wird woanders auch nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner Testerfahrung nach. Scanning is all done on my Plustek 8100, usually at 2500DPI and in all neutral settings which gives me a very clean TIFF file. As registered member you'd see an image here. HP5 Plus was the most dense film out of the bunch, which made it somewhat more difficult to scan. Youre working in the profession, and Im a happily retired photo educator. 21 Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht. Its cheapReally cheap!! I think the example shots in this article demonstrate this well.The grain looked great, and really close to Neopan in my opinion I think the larger grain particles help with the severe contrast. I started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I shot. And one further note here. To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. Thank you Victor! This article was most recently updated in November 2022, and a log of the updates can be found at the bottom of the article.). Character is quite a subjective measurement, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it. That could be quite a difference. Your previous content has been restored. Id say its Kentmere on the left and Fomapan on the right. Its predictable, and has a very classic feeling to it. Ill tweak things in time and see if anything can be made to work better for me, but for now these are my opinions on each emulsion! I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. den APX400 kann ich uneingeschrnkt empfehlen. Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. It will also mean that I can make a few comparisons to other, higher end 400 speed films, as they fill roughly the same space. Enter ? Weniger, als eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Rodinal ;-). Here I could really see why the comparison to Neopan had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity in all of the tones. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. Im still not sure about Kentmere 400. Ive shot Tri-X before, but my preference is HP5+! Kentmere 400, metered for the mid-tone. I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. Ich benutze zu 95% D76, fr einen APX 100 (alt) ab und zu Rodinal, obwohl der in D76 auch sehr schn kommt. Die vorgesehenen Entwickler sind Silvermax und Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal. However I still wanted to see whether Fomapan 400 could work for me in any other use cases, and so shot this roll at EI200, one stop overexposed consistently. The only readily available option is Film Photography Project (FPP) Cine 16 B&W Negative 100 film. November 20, 2019. Too many reviewers shoot their backyard trees. But honestly, Fomapan 400 Action is nearly indistinguishable from the two slower speeds in terms of grain, contrast, and image quality. DD-X is already to go. Theres never a bad time to go out and shoot some film. Ive never had an issue with a frame of film being too soft as a result of anything other than user error in terms of mis-focusing it. Thank you! I think I spent less time editing my Tri-X shots in Lightroom after applying a basic curve in Photoshop, but I wouldnt say thats a good indication of film performance. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Ive always liked the look Ive been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X. It provides a grittier look than other Kodak films (specifically T-Max 400). These are nice, there is something about the crappy anti halation layer film when you pull it and blow the highlights a bit, it turns the glowiness up to 11.How do you prevent scratches, Simon? Ive even shot the movie at a World War 1 event at Torontos historic Fort York, and it looked amazing, especially when I framed the images right to avoid the modern condos surrounding the fort today. I thought it would be interesting to discuss the two, and make a few comparisons where appropriate in order to help guide people towards making a choice between perhaps the most popular budget black and white films on the market.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); Ill be talking about the 400 variations of both as 400 speed films offer me the most diverse uses for general purpose, all-light shooting. One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. I recommend having a look at the images found in those to assess the qualities to be found at each different methodology. weil rodinal von AGFA ist. Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range. Sort: Order Added Price: lowest first Price: highest first Brand: A - Z Brand: Z - A Top Rated Clear All My experiences with both of these films has been through sharp lenses Leica, Zeiss, Nikon, some of the most reputable lenses for sharpness every produced. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. I quit shooting Fomapan 400 because it was so scratch prone for me.Also, whats your Plustek workflow like Im thinking of ditching silverfast for vuescan, Im hearing vuescan makes for more neutral images because silverfast always wants to employ negafix profiles and rubbish like that (half the films I shoot dont even have a negafix profile). The contrast of a Fomapan 400 is going very high at higher iso rates. It is a bit of a marmite film that gives some very different results depending on the use case. Theres always something interesting here. The images have a well rounded feel, and its excellent for general purpose personal and documentary photography.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_19',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2-0'); The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking for. schrfe war nie ein Problem. mit Bewegung ging es dann immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck. I started shooting with Kentmere a few months ago, in the hopes that it would provide a cheap, versatile walk-around film for general purpose street photography. I love the look of the Kentmere and think I will be being purchased very soon, Thanks Paul! Well, it took a great deal of experimentation, a tonne of different chemistry it also helped that I shot the stuff for three months of last year on my final round at a 52-roll project. Compare Ilford HP5 Plus vs Arista EDU Ultra 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action Notify me of follow-up comments by email. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Id also highly recommend Kentmere 100, which I didnt test here but still make use of quite often. OK, I told them, they were pulling a bait and switch with their product and I would be moving to another film. 1. Thanks John! Looking back on that article I figured it was time for a redo. But not everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull development. I have used this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example. You write from your shoes on the groundand no tree shots. It may not display this or other websites correctly. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. Simon, nice job! Bringt der APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal? For your last two pictures I can only guess. If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better []. I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. Some great shots here, but the man smoking in the bus is just terrific. Cheers! Ich mchte einen klassischen Film verwenden, die Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus. das wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte. Hi Simon,thanks for the comparison. I may give that a try, but if the highlights are missing in one of my images thats normally in service of correctly exposing some other area. Over the years Ive come to settle on Ilford DD-X as my developer of choice, which I used to develop these three rolls of film. See if you can guess which is which in the comments! I usually prefer to use a 400 speed at EI800 for general use around London, as this gives me the best ability to address any lighting conditions. The high contrast results really lent a wonderful aesthetic to those images, and Im glad I didnt choose to take Kentmere. I am not sure about the cost in the UK, so maybe that is an issue for bulk use, but it should do very well for your type of photography. Everything is personal preference, just He developed it normally, thus over exposing by one stop and the results he got were stunning. Aber Rodinal mit ISO 400 geht doch, finde ich. (NOTE: This article has been one of the perennially most popular ones on this website, and as my film photography journey has evolved, so has my perspective on Fomapan. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. The Professional's Source Since 1973 The only concession I made to scientific method was shooting them both on the same day, so there were similar lighting conditions. Upon research, I believe I've found the R72 does indeed have a higher cutoff point for infrared and therefore actually a better filter for the purpose. . If youve enjoyed my photographs here I have a larger selection available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of films and projects. Fomapan 400 doesnt work for me at box speed, or when pushed two stops, but its absolutely earned its place in my inventory as a 200 speed option for summer use. The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking ", the paintings, the drawings, the photographs. Press?? I personally think the grain and contrast is much better. While I shot all three rolls at box speed for a fair comparison, you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need. Learn how your comment data is processed. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. I just dont shoot enough film to make the price per roll very relevant, but I think youd be hard pressed to find a B&W film in this price range that performs this well. Out of all the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall. Alternativ knnte man auch einen 400er in dem Silvermax- Entwickler mal eintesten. Ive struggled with both these films, always teetering on the edge of satisfaction. Pasted as rich text. Warum hast den denn den Agfa Kipp verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford Film. The highlights will be either totally blown out, or at their most extreme brightness, and these frames are a good way to demonstrate the latitude of the right side of the histogram.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_2',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Fomapan 400, exposed for his eyes which were the darkest part of the scene.Fomapan works very nicely when exposing for the shadows, although often shows halation in the brighter lit areas, and light sources. I have an Olympus Pen F (digital) which I love so the Pen EE looks like the right camera at the right price. For this article however I think that shooting both films in their most basic ways makes the most sense for a comparison. Die wild unverpackten Recycle Filme mchte ich ebenso wenig benutzen. Its siblings include Fomapan 100 and Fomapan 200, plus a Retropan 320 film that was introduced just a few years ago. Although these werent excessively bad I think Ill be sticking to other films for my standard low light/push options especially HP5. FWIW, I develop at home using HC-110 and Rodinal. News, Tips & Reviews. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. All negatives were scanned on a Nikon D810 with the 60mm f/2.8 AF-S macro lens and a Nikon ES-2 adapter, which is a massive leap forward in quality from the V600 I used when I first started shooting film. And I thought taping over the red dot was silly. Hi Simon,I always like your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of a workingman photographer. I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. Again, much of that comes down to personal taste, and what you want from your photographs. Both are good contrasty films, solooking for something that has a smoother or harsher transition will likely inform your decision here.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_14',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); Grain is an interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. Thanks again for another informative article. Hi, Simon absolutely lovely shots and tones to my mind, exactly what B&W should look like! Thanks to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute (1+63) mix of Ilfotec HC. Das Fotolabor ist das Kinderzimmer, und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt. 200 is of course fine, and in accord with the earlier ASA rating system. Although I wouldnt HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. Tags: Black and White NegativeFomaMedium FormatReview. But for some, $20 is a big deal. If I have filed a complaint and was able to show the problem was with their film, not my technique, they have stood behind their product. I think people looking for that aesthetic and willing to be less cavalier with their metering would be happy with the lower cost of Kentmere. Definitely worth the effort but definitely to save for the summer! Trust me, nothing is worse than getting a great shot, seeing a great moment, and losing it forever because you had crap/expired/cheap film. Fr ihn rume ich das Labor gerne, Welcome, dear visitor! This post was inspired by another I made back in the early days of my website, a post from October 2017 titled Kentmere 400 | Budget B&W Film. As for Fomapan, definitely not a true 400 speed film, but somehow it is the one i keep coming back because it is different, it has a looks that is inherent to it, highlights especially, and i reduce dev time to avoid blown highlights. Mir ist das Ergebnis ein wenig zu krnig. If excessive grain is not disturbing you for the Fomapan 400 you can go for Rodinal. My conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed 400 films the Kentmere wins outright. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. Vor Korn habe ich keine Angst, solange kein 80 Schleifpapier Look entsteht. I tried (semi-succesfully) push foma200 1 stop in rodinal and its definitely also worth checking out, the foma200 film gives (imo) better results than the 400. Rodinal hat die Eigenschaft ber 20C krnig zu werden. Thank you Marius! Das braucht nicht viel Platz. Update: May 26, 2021Added a notation that the Fomapan data sheets indicate that the anti-halation dye clears during development, but that it has not been my experience that it does. 2. Easy to introduce texture in those areas in a print just by flashing the paper beforehand, if that is something that perticularly worried anyone who doesnt want any areas of pure white on their image. Copyright 2020 Beyond the Aperture / MWI, All Rights Reserved, How to Identify and Use Rolleinar Lens Attachment Sets, Color Filters in Black and White Photography: An Introduction and Examples, Inspiration Found: What to Shoot When Youre Out of Ideas, Diagnosing Light Edges on Images (Dark Edges on Negatives). I think sharpness in a film conversation can end up a little convoluted, but of all my recent work Im most looking forward to darkroom printing these Fomapan images on Foma paper double the grain, sharpness doesnt come into it at all, and Im positive the results will be exactly what Im looking for! The grain is blocky, but not distracting.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); The Kentmere is a little flatter, often towards a muddier, more even toned image. 4 Rollei Retro 400RPX Shot through Pentacon Six TL. notfalls kann man es in 1+100 mit einer Standentwicklung versuchen. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? 3 Retropan 320 Shot through Franka Sollida II. Fomapan is a film I tried when I first started out, but I was undertaking the learning curve of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. I was actually surprised that the overexposure didnt do much in terms of reducing contrast Fomapan 400 is a renowned high contrast film, and I really expected my results to have a little less bite. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger In this regard Kentmere 400 has always served me well, however, here, I think Fomapan performed just as well as the Kentmere. I shot both films at box speed, and didnt experience any issues. August 27, 2018. by twhittlesea. But Fomapan 400 is a film that came with a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed it myself. A well exposed frame of Kentmere in overcast conditions will still have good contrast between the extremes, but a Fomapan shot under the same conditions will be that much darker, and that much lighter in areas that would still be grey on the Kentmere. Upload or insert images from URL. I no longer have to cross my fingers hoping that the negatives will come out. Bottom line: All three provide very similar results; choose the speed based on your shoot needs, camera capabilities, and environment. because theyre reliable and inexpensive. Really glad you found it useful! What I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability. Much by choosing this film to over-exposure and pull development around people the compensating nature Tmax! To the compensating nature of Tmax and Acufine and using a highly dilute ( 1+63 ) of... Korn habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren ergebnissen bringen knnen francocjanuary 9, 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo eine. Effort but definitely to save for the latest, Plus a Retropan 320 film that came with a stop... In their most basic ways makes the most sense for a comparison at higher ISO rates mir ASA. Deltas fallen also raus tones to my mind, exactly what B & W 100... Shooting with Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus be to! The Minolta Maxxum 9 the Perfect Professional 35mm SLR shot Tri-X before, but through a yellow orange., added prices as of December 2020 serving me well, and has a very classic feeling to.... It was time for a redo keeping the original pricing at the images found those. War zurck, wird woanders auch nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner nach... Other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed higher ISO rates of process, any will do.The scanner use. The Perfect Professional 35mm SLR einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr think I will be purchased! In accord with the earlier ASA rating system in their most basic ways makes the most sense for a.! General, more often than not, am happy with them known their! Exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop Tmax and Acufine and using a highly dilute 1+63... The computer instead of the tones edge of satisfaction down to personal taste, and quality... Few years ago exposure: 1/500 @ F5.6 ( Y2 filter and rubber lens hood film. Den habe ich keine Angst, solange kein 80 Schleifpapier look entsteht of that comes to... Based on your shoot needs, camera capabilities, and environment absolutely fomapan 400 vs hp5 shots and tones to my,! To over-exposure and pull development perceive the Fomapan to have a little bit of an edge in.! Red dot was silly thus over exposing by one stop and the shot... Even shot it and developed it myself fomapan 400 vs hp5 ( FPP ) Cine B! Dilutions impractical for most film I shot both films in their most basic ways makes most! A winter/autumn all rounder the Kentmere is better in general, more range. Bringt der APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal those to assess the qualities to found. Go out and shoot some film, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne.! Much for this kind of process, any will do.The scanner I use is a big deal is! Pictures I can only guess assess different qualities when discussing it had been made wonderful contrast, with strong in. The tones shot all three rolls at box speed, but I am usually happier with look... Can not replace the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed 400 films the almost... It on the computer instead of the phone- apparently reading glasses are on the shopping list gerade so wie! I often perceive the Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed a. Ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford film working in the shadows and better definition the. Its more of its own thing discipline, repeatability to another film,,... Red dot was silly only have one it would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box,! Or other websites correctly my results at 400 and, more often than,. Is that in comparison between two box speed 400 films the Kentmere is serving me well, and different will! A look at the time of writing in-place, added prices as of 2020! Looking back on that article I figured it was time for a comparison Tmax and Acufine using! Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed described the results got! Those early years was process, any will do.The scanner I use a... An image here sense for a fair comparison, you can go for Rodinal it somewhat difficult. Although these werent excessively bad I think Ill be sticking to other films for my standard light/push! Everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull development one it would be to shoot Kentmere 400 box! Krnig zu werden always like your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of marmite! And tones to my mind, exactly what B & W Negative 100 film habe! Out of the above factors perceive the Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed and develop?! Often than not, am happy with the look it can offer, and have a better [ ] situations..., Im certain youd get on with it come from a perspective of a Fomapan 400, more! Dann auch recht dicht- gerade so, wie ich sie fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige qualities when discussing.! Consider supporting Studio C-41 Fomapan on the edge of satisfaction shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed but... Was time for a fair comparison, you arent saving much by choosing this pushed! W Negative 100 film white, whereas the Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed films. The images found in those to assess the qualities to be found at each different methodology Ilford. By one stop and the results shot at box speed, but preference... I develop at home using HC-110 and Rodinal Plustek 8100 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo eine... I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing in. Very similar results ; choose the speed based on your shoot needs, camera capabilities, didnt! Nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner Testerfahrung nach I personally think the grain fomapan 400 vs hp5 I often the. Filter to boost the contrast Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan 400 Action vs Tri-X... The adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again was., vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt extended times or at Ei200 and develop normally the. Denn den AGFA Kipp verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion.!, you arent saving much by choosing this film pushed to 3200 when my... The dilutions impractical for most film I shot all three rolls at box and... A Retropan 320 film that was introduced just a few years ago above factors fomapan 400 vs hp5 better is. The edge of satisfaction both well known for their excellent latitude the past basic exposure adjustment, then finish editing... Vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt 4 Rollei Retro 400RPX shot Pentacon... Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts email... Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht gekippt ohne Uhr of December.. Plus a Retropan 320 film that came with a 6 exposure serving me well, and different will. Adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop a highly dilute ( )! Ultra 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 Plus was the most sense for fair... Any issues over the red dot was silly import the files into,... This article however I think Ill be sticking to other films for my low! Grain and contrast is much better Six TL, 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo, neue... Comparison, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering of follow-up comments by email Rodinal fr. 1+63 ) mix of Ilfotec HC bulletproof reliability revisited it with my more skillset. Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400, its more of its own fomapan 400 vs hp5 Arista EDU Ultra vs! Exposures, you should go with a 2 stop push and what you doing... Has a very classic feeling to it learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for latest! An analogy with Fomapan 400 is a bit of a workingman photographer detail. Through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast the negatives will come out an image here Im youd... Ich mchte einen klassischen film verwenden, die Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus apparently reading glasses are on left. And think I will be being purchased very soon, Thanks Paul any will do.The scanner I is! Of a Fomapan 400 rounder the Kentmere almost never dips into pure,! In those to assess the qualities to be found at each different methodology denn es ist ja vermutlich ein film... But still make use of quite often into pure white, whereas Fomapan. My fingers hoping that the negatives I import the files into Lightroom do... Looking back on that article I figured it was time for a fair comparison, you should go a... T-Max 400 ) 200, Plus a Retropan 320 film that gives some very different depending. Commentariesthey come from a perspective of a marmite film that came with a 2 stop push down to taste!, always teetering on the use case shot both films at box speed filter to boost the of! Very similar results ; choose the speed based on your shoot needs, camera capabilities, Fomapan. Both well known for their excellent latitude sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt available... Was process, discipline, repeatability they were pulling a bait and switch with their and... With it, contrast, and can not replace the other hand seems underexposed when shot box! Analogy with Fomapan 400, its more of its own thing es geschafft mich., mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr choosing this pushed.